Kürzliche Tweet-Ergebnisse
-
RT @talyarkoni: This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that @PsychScience and @APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad). https://t.co/8QicjuIuzI
Tue Nov 17 08:52:19 +0000 2020 -
RT @fahd09: الشيء الذي لايفهمه أحد في عالم النشر العلمي: أموال دافعي الضرائب تصرف لدعم العلماء الذين يقومون بأبحاث تخدم الصالح العام. ولكن النتائج يتم نشرها في مجلات مغلقة لا يستطيع دافعي الضرائب ولا الباحثين الاطلاع عليها إلا بمقابل مادي فلكي !!! لغز لا أفهم كيف صار واقع مُعاش. https://t.co/K5E2l73mQp
Tue Oct 06 19:28:52 +0000 2020 -
RT @HikingHack: Last year I got so fed up w/ the exploitative practices of academic publishers like ACM that I took the money that would just vaporize for publishing 2-3 papers with them (and going to the mandatory conferences) that I just hosted my own free conference https://t.co/EU7p6OWaWn https://t.co/mUXlri9zZy
Tue Mar 31 02:47:52 +0000 2020 -
RT @talyarkoni: This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that @PsychScience and @APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad). https://t.co/8QicjuIuzI
Tue Feb 11 12:21:00 +0000 2020 -
RT @lovettbr: This letter is disgusting and effectively serves as a list of societies and publishers to avoid. 👇 https://t.co/XtVUPXZSh6
Tue Feb 11 04:31:17 +0000 2020 -
RT @tdietterich: I think @ACM_president and @esa are on the wrong side of this issue. It is time to re-imagine publication models and break the stranglehold of for-profit publishers on the dissemination of scientific research. Time to rethink how research is done! https://t.co/9B17tVcyqM
Thu Jan 30 16:26:35 +0000 2020 -
RT @talyarkoni: This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that @PsychScience and @APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad). https://t.co/8QicjuIuzI
Sat Jan 25 06:15:24 +0000 2020 -
@unpaywall @kopernio Sources: (Thanks to @kommueller & @tdienlin) 🇩🇪 https://t.co/JQpIxNzuFK 🇺🇸 https://t.co/spPiGCyRM1 --> The first source makes it clear that these rights cannot be legally signed away. Thus, the law distinguishes between scientific creations and movies, songs, books, etc.
Mon Jan 13 08:48:56 +0000 2020 -
RT @talyarkoni: This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that @PsychScience and @APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad). https://t.co/8QicjuIuzI
Fri Jan 10 10:25:53 +0000 2020 -
RT @jimiadams: Ultimately, this was the last straw leading me to resign from the board of @ElsevierConnect journal Social Networks. https://t.co/k3WYfhG9VX
Sun Jan 05 00:23:26 +0000 2020 -
RT @jimiadams: Ultimately, this was the last straw leading me to resign from the board of @ElsevierConnect journal Social Networks. https://t.co/k3WYfhG9VX
Sat Jan 04 17:16:25 +0000 2020 -
Ultimately, this was the last straw leading me to resign from the board of @ElsevierConnect journal Social Networks. https://t.co/k3WYfhG9VX
Sat Jan 04 16:28:04 +0000 2020 -
RT @barner_ucsd: This letter gets intellectual property exactly backwards. It’s not the property of publishers that will be “nationalized” and given away for free. It’s national property that has been corporatized and is being repatriated to the people who funded it. Embarrassing for @SRCDtweets https://t.co/OSuMiYN62Y
Fri Jan 03 00:56:04 +0000 2020 -
RT @vijaymarupudi: Science should be collaborative, not competitive. Access to science should not be restricted to rich countries and universities. The nerve to claim that increasing access would "undermine scientific discovery"... Very disappointed in APA and APS for endorsing this. https://t.co/YgQBsrkfNY
Wed Jan 01 20:48:07 +0000 2020 -
RT @GhawinRiver: As a PhD-Student headed for the job market in 1-2 years, I should have a care with my words about this. Those words are: Really? All 125 of y'all thought this was a good look? The next generation of scientists is watching this. Is this what you want them to see? https://t.co/sOzpyxJT5g
Wed Jan 01 12:03:30 +0000 2020 -
RT @AmyPerfors: Just resigned from the editorial board of Cognition (an Elsevier journal) over this. I've felt conflicted about being on it for a while, due to the Elsevier link, despite the fact that Cognition is a great journal. This was the last straw. Sigh. https://t.co/U7xpNen4X7
Tue Dec 31 03:52:45 +0000 2019 -
RT @talyarkoni: This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that @PsychScience and @APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad). https://t.co/8QicjuIuzI
Sun Dec 29 15:38:04 +0000 2019 -
RT @csarven: How much federal income tax did these entities pay in 2019 (or in previous years)? #OAintheUS https://t.co/OTwDywRXyD
Sat Dec 28 18:54:26 +0000 2019 -
RT @csarven: How much federal income tax did these entities pay in 2019 (or in previous years)? #OAintheUS https://t.co/OTwDywRXyD
Sat Dec 28 18:08:45 +0000 2019 -
How much federal income tax did these entities pay in 2019 (or in previous years)? #OAintheUS https://t.co/OTwDywRXyD
Sat Dec 28 16:53:54 +0000 2019 -
RT @siminevazire: Shocking. Publishers want to stop a regulation that would make it harder for them to copyright & sell scientists’ work back to our own institutions. Framing it as somehow a noble position, in the interest of scientific discovery, is kind of gross. https://t.co/hZszwWnow3
Sat Dec 28 04:43:40 +0000 2019 -
RT @siminevazire: Shocking. Publishers want to stop a regulation that would make it harder for them to copyright & sell scientists’ work back to our own institutions. Framing it as somehow a noble position, in the interest of scientific discovery, is kind of gross. https://t.co/hZszwWnow3
Sat Dec 28 04:07:00 +0000 2019 -
RT @siminevazire: Shocking. Publishers want to stop a regulation that would make it harder for them to copyright & sell scientists’ work back to our own institutions. Framing it as somehow a noble position, in the interest of scientific discovery, is kind of gross. https://t.co/hZszwWnow3
Sat Dec 28 04:04:03 +0000 2019 -
RT @STORKinesiology: If you think the current publishing system is broken, please consider supporting community owned and operated non-profits like ours! https://t.co/mxv5cmLCxa https://t.co/sOIcL8N4Dw
Fri Dec 27 08:01:24 +0000 2019 -
RT @STORKinesiology: If you think the current publishing system is broken, please consider supporting community owned and operated non-profits like ours! https://t.co/mxv5cmLCxa https://t.co/sOIcL8N4Dw
Fri Dec 27 06:39:55 +0000 2019 -
RT @STORKinesiology: If you think the current publishing system is broken, please consider supporting community owned and operated non-profits like ours! https://t.co/mxv5cmLCxa https://t.co/sOIcL8N4Dw
Fri Dec 27 06:36:48 +0000 2019